In contrast to lgpl, gpl requires that you provide the code for all changes made to the software. Gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. The long and short of itif you use open source software within your software development project, any permissive license should be fine. Gpl licensed software, in exchange for keeping downstream uses open, prevents developers from releasing their own derivative programs under more restrictive licenses. Why corporations favors the apache license over the gpllgpl. What is open source software vs proprietary softwareclosed source software gpl license. While much of what we will cover may be known to some readers, we believe that there is. Elle a ete redigee afin deviter des concepts ou des termes, specifiques a certains. This is especially a concern for libraries which are building blocks for larger software. The gpl license is viral, meaning any derivative work you create containing even the smallest portion of the previously gpl licensed software must also be licensed under the gpl license.
When users incorporate a component licensed under one of the gpl licenses, they must release its source code, as well. Jun 29, 2007 by contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users. The comparison only covers software licenses with a linked article for details, approved by at least one expert group at the fsf, the osi, the debian project or the fedora project. Therefore it is not fair or accurate to credit the gpl as an open source license merely because the open source initiative which started the open source movement. There was some discussion about this data back when it was released in 2011. Among other restrictions, you must not modify, reverse engineer, or copy the software.
Linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. The primary incompatibility is that this python license is governed by the laws of the state of virginia, in the usa, and the gpl does not permit this. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and software. Boy, there are so many weasel words in that article it reads like gpl fud to me. The gpl governs the distribution of the software, not its use. This module will cover these and other legal issues that arise from the interplay between open source software and patents. Generally, mit recommends either the bsd license or the gplv2 or lgplv2 licenses. The gpl is no more viral than any commercial license, the only difference is in how you pay to use the software. A federal court has ruled that an opensource license is. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software into gplv3 works. Gplv3 of june 29, 2007 contains the basic intent of gplv2 and is an open source license with a strict copyleft what types of licenses are there for open source software, and how do they differ. However, the gnu general public license or gpl predates the open source movement by many years by the founder of a movement with different goals than the open source movement. For a list of licenses not specifically intended for software, see list of free content licenses. Raymonds argument seems to be that if openness is the winning strategy, an argument michael tiemann advocates, wouldnt it make sense to use the most.
The gnu general public license the gpl hereafter has been selected as the most commonlyused freeopen source software foss license. The gpl is very restrictive in the sense it forces any derivative work to be released open source under the same terms. Gpl and lgpl open source licensing restrictions stack. Zabbix is free and open source software, however, if you use zabbix in a commercial context we kindly ask you to support development of zabbix by purchasing some level of commercial support. The gpl general public license is another popular open source license. It allows users to study, run, share, and modify the software. The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. This is an open source license, certified by the open source initiative. While being the most widely used of the open source licenses, the viral nature of the gpl license can prove problematic for some commercial developers. The php license is a bsdstyle license which does not have the copyleft restrictions associated with gpl. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. Difference between different types of open sources licenses. The gnu gpl requires that when you use gpllicensed software to make some other software, the resulting software also has to be opensourced with.
No one open source license is ideal in every circumstance. Gpl is basically the legal terminology that makes open source software what it is. To understand the difference between gpl and lgpl you have to understand the basic idea of open source software. One of the most interesting features of mysql is the license. Recent versions of the open software license have a term which requires distributors to try to obtain explicit assent to the license. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula youtube. Jun 12, 2007 the gpl is no more viral than any commercial license, the only difference is in how you pay to use the software. Right now there are two licenses that are most commonly used for open source software the gnu public licensegnu lesser public license and the apache license. The gpl license imposes similar obligations as the bsdlike licenses, but one major difference persists.
Jan 23, 2020 the gpl was a trailblazer at the start of the open source revolution and is a prime example of the copyleft or viral license. If you use a bsl licensed library, youll need to write your own disclaimer stating that you arent responsible if the software turns into a threeheaded monster and. This is a comparison of free and open source software licenses. Its generally appropriate for libraries and projects that want to allow linking from nongpl and nonopensource. The gnu general public license is a free software license, created by the free software foundationfsf. A gpl functions as a license, and when a software author releases their product using a gpl, they are licensing whomever receives the software to use it as they. The tlo will discuss open source licensing strategies with the authors. Which license to use a great many developers, myself included, believe that it is important to spend at least some time contributing to open source software projects. There are many open source licenses to choose from, some of them being mit, gnu gpl, apache 2.
What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses. The open software license is a free software license. For example, there is a lot of pressure on linux gplv2 to include suns now oracles zfs filesystem cddl license, from solaris, as it is a more mature, tested alternative to the seemingly forever trapped in development linux native btrfs. For a list of licenses not specifically i ntended fo r software, see list of free cont ent licenses. Difference between gpl and lgpl difference between. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may wish to relicense your software under gpl version 3. The gpl was a trailblazer at the start of the open source revolution and is a prime example of the copyleft or viral license. Gpl general public license is a free license software that is popularly used across the world. This is a comparison of free and open sourc e software licen ses. Jun 21, 2016 most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense.
The gpl is used by wellknown platforms and software technology such as linux, gnome, kde, and mysql. If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. A federal court has ruled that an opensource license is an. Liste des licences avec commentaires projet gnu free software. Gnu general public license version 2 open source initiative. That is, the complete source code of mysql is freely available. Software and open source licensing mit technology licensing. This is a free software license but is incompatible with the gnu gpl. However, it is a copyleft license, as opposed to the permissive bsd, mit, and apache licenses. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software.
These projects will hopefully be licensed if you havent got a license on your open source project, youre doing it wrong, to ensure that your contributions. Aug 07, 2018 open source dual licensing two licenses for one product. This is a comparison of free and opensource software licenses. Each has advantages, but the distinctions are sometimes quite subtle. Does the python software foundation license permit.
Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and. Berkeley software distributionstyle licenses have been used to govern the development of. Use of the manual is a subject to the following terms. Gnu general public license, version 2 spdx short identifier. The gpl was intended to keep software from becoming proprietary. I also show how you can sell open source software by. You can find the legal text for the gpl here, but heres a quick summary of what it means. Jan 21, 20 the free source crowd looked to the gnu general public license as the ideal license to enforce user freedom, because it forced ironclad guarantees that the code in question would remain open source, while the open source group focused on a broader definition of freedom, preferring the more liberal apache license. The osi recommends a mix of permissive and copyleft licenses, the apache license 2. This ticket regarding the boost open source license v1. Use of gpl licenses increased, but as more corporations begin using open source they chose other licenses where possible which permit them to close the software. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may.
Aug 30, 2019 in this video i explain the difference between mit, gpl, apache licenses and how to write custom licenses. What is foss licensesapache, bsd, gpl, lgpl explained. And its always worth remembering that you dont have to share until you distribute the sourcecode and as corporations are legal entities, you can give a copy to all your odd coworkers without legally distributing it. Apr 07, 2017 gnu lesser general public license it grants fewer right to work than gnu gpl. This license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. Some of the mostinstalled open source software is gpllicensed, such as linux, wordpress, and wikipedias underlying software, mediawiki. Since public domain doesnt add restrictions, the combination is good as long as you obey the gpl terms and the public domain terms. The one most widely used is the general public license gpl, which we cover in this article. Licenses for your open source project mit vs gpl vs apache. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project free. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software.
Php 4, php 5 and php 7 are distributed under the php license v3. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project. This essay argues that developers of freelibre open source software floss, aka ossfs should use an existing widelyused license compatible with the general public license gpl, particularly the gpl, lgpl, mitx, or bsdnew licenses. Lgpl is used for software libraries, versus the execution files of gpl. A proper license ensures that people do not steal your works. This post takes a look at the legal issues raised by both cases and what they mean for foss producers and users. When versata software sued ameriprise financial services for breaching its software license, it unwittingly unearthed a gpl violation of its own and touched off another lawsuit that could prove to be a leading case on free and open source software licensing. This license was originally written by richard stallman from the free software foundation for the gnu project. Historically, the gpl license family has been one of the most popular software licenses in the free and opensource. Copyleft or free software licensing helps ensure open standards and the continuity of the code. Gnu general public license, version 3 spdx short identifier. David chisnall compares the two most popular software licenses in the free and open source software foss communities. Why you should use a bsd style license for your open.
Licence zabbix the enterpriseclass open source network. It is incompatible with the gnu gpl in several ways. Nov 08, 2015 linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. The gnu general public licence, or gpl as its often called, is the most popular free software licence and its used by many different projects, including the linux kernel, the gnu tools and literally hundreds of others. I also show how you can sell open source software by selling license exceptions. Licenses for your open source project mit vs gpl vs. Since you have access to the codes through open source software, you are permitted to make changes, improve it, and create your own twist. Gpl program is infecting and infected the parent and the child non gpl process proprietary and even other open source license from the perspective of law. Among the two gpl is the basis of open source software for programmers. However, the language of the license text was strongly amended and is much more comprehensive in response to technical and legal changes and. Wikipedias content is mostly under the creative commons bysa license, which has similar sharealike features to the gpl. We will also summarize the terms of use of the most.
The comparison only c overs software l icenses with a linked article for details, approved by at least one expert group at the fsf, the osi, the debian project or the fedora project. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a. Gpl offers a wide range of potential improvements for the entire programming community. It first came into being in the month of september of 1983. Gnu general public license this license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. This general public license does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. While open sourcing a project, one needs a license so that the terms distribution, linking, modification, private use, etc. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses. In this video i explain the difference between mit, gpl, apache licenses and how to write custom licenses. Commercial licenses on the other hand talk about the use of the software. Lgpl allows you to use and distribute the open source software with your application without releasing the source code for your application.
The apache license, on the other hand, is favored by the big corporations for their open source projects. There are several unofficial modules floating around, meaning the technical obstacles arent insurmountable. Once the tlo has approved release of the software via an open source license, you may then post or distribute your software under such open source license. However, the language of the license text was strongly amended and is much more comprehensive in response to technical and legal changes and international license exchange. It is thus ensured that mysql will continue to be freely available in the sense of. Infecting means derived program violate gpl, infected means gpl program violate its own license. May 11, 2017 the gnu gpl requires that when you use gpllicensed software to make some other software, the resulting software also has to be opensourced with the same license if its released to the public. Understanding opensource and free software licensing medium. When users incorporate a component licensed under one of the gpl licenses, they must release its source code, as well as the rights to modify and distribute the entire code. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. Gpl requires you to release the source code of your application if you choose to use and distribute the gpl licensed open source software with your application. Both copyleft and permissive licenses allow developers to copy, modify, and redistribute code derivative or otherwise freely. The gnulgpl is very popular among independent developers and companies which mainly deals with open source software. The gpl builds on the traditional open source license by requiring the release of source code of any piece of software that is built on another piece of open source software.
Dual licensing emerged as an open source business model in the early 2000s, and it typically refers to the release of a software component under two licenses simultaneously. We, the free software foundation, use the gnu general public license for most of our software. Licensing of ones works is a huge issue in the world of open source software. Also, it is a common misconception that open source software cannot be patented.
100 1009 214 1030 165 788 138 762 1284 974 1270 565 973 41 1638 1026 243 878 240 1356 691 396 114 936 730 85 131 40 451 799 817 704 218 1628 272 746 911 1104 1398 166 1490 166 432